As liberal politicians continue to lose ground in the hearts and minds of American voters, they have entrenched themselves within the federal judiciary. Unable to win at the ballot box, the left now relies on unelected judges to preserve and impose their agenda on a nation that’s increasingly rejecting it.
The pattern is clear. Conservative legislatures pass laws to protect children from exposure to indecency and radical gender ideology—liberal judges strike them down. The president and state governors move to enforce long-standing immigration laws—judges issue nationwide injunctions, blocking national and state policy. Christian professionals are penalized for speaking truth in the workplace, and courts protect the ideologies that silence them.
This is not justice. It’s radical judicial activism serving as a firewall for a defeated political movement.
Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden together appointed over 480 of the 833 active federal judges—roughly 58% of the federal bench. This orchestrated plan for judicial overreach doesn’t exist in a vacuum—it aligns with a broader, more insidious globalist agenda. Each case of judicial interference now functions as a shield for lawless policies that weaken America and prepare the way for a “one world,” anti-God order.
Consider Judge James Boasberg, an Obama appointee, and his recent ruling halting the deportation of foreign nationals with violent gang affiliations. While headlines focused on procedural nuances, the deeper issue is this: once again, a liberal judge stepped in to protect lawless policies that destabilize the nation and breed chaos—policies already rejected by President Trump, most state governors, Congress, and a growing majority of Americans.
Now for the good news. Congressional Republicans are finally responding with the No Rogue Rulings Act, legislation designed to prohibit federal judges from issuing nationwide injunctions that extend beyond the scope of their proper jurisdiction. The Founders never intended for one federal judge among 833 to have the power override the elected will of an entire nation. Article III of the Constitution empowers the judiciary to decide individual cases and controversies—not to serve as a partisan backstop for a failing agenda. Yes, the appellate system exists to correct such overreach—but timing is often crucial, and justice cannot be delayed while waiting for another court to take its turn at political posturing. Yes, the Supreme Court is mostly conservative, but it often takes far too long for them to step in, and they too are subject to political pressures, so they don’t always get it right.
The left understands this imbalance, and they have exploited it in every way possible. When they lose power, they don’t concede defeat. They recalibrate. Rather than retreating from the fight, they regroup in the courts—armed with decades of activist appointments and armies of lawyers—and from there, they continue advancing policies that would never survive public debate.
And what are these policies? Open borders. Gender confusion in schools. The erasure of traditional marriage. The suppression of religious conviction in public life. Thought and speech control. The dismantling of the Judeo-Christian moral code that is the backbone of the U.S. Constitution. These are not passive legal disagreements. They represent a deliberate campaign to dismantle the moral framework that once held this republic together.
We must recognize this for what it is: not merely political maneuvering, but spiritual erosion.
The battle is not simply legal. It is moral. And more than that—it is biblically prophetic. As the Apostle Paul warned, “God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may believe what is false” (2 Thessalonians 2:11). That is precisely what we are witnessing—the judicial system being used to reinforce delusion and suppress truth, even as the systems of this world align against it.
The courts have become the last stronghold of a defeated ideology. If we are to preserve liberty, order, and truth, we must reestablish the boundaries our Constitution intended and the moral clarity our faith requires. For the sake of future generations, we must stand for the truth of God—boldly, unapologetically, and without compromise.