Millstones and Storybooks: The LGBT Indoctrination Case SCOTUS Shouldn’t Even Have to Hear

It’s hard to imagine a more ridiculous legal argument than the one liberals just dragged into the U.S. Supreme Court. According to a report from Reuters, the Montgomery County, Maryland school board insists that parents should not have the right to opt their elementary-age children out of storybooks that celebrate same-sex relationships, transgender identity, and drag-queen-style gender confusion. Why? Because they argue that honoring parental rights might cause “administrative burdens” or stigmatize kids who come from LGBT households.

That’s their argument. The paperwork might be too much—so your child must be forced to sit through lessons that violate your faith, your moral compass, and 2,000 years of Judeo-Christian ethics. According to the Left, your child’s understanding of right and wrong should be sacrificed so that LGBT folks can continue trying to indoctrinate them.

Thank God this Court doesn’t seem to be buying it.

Justice Samuel Alito cut straight through the rainbow fog, noting one book’s message is clearly “inconsistent with traditional religious beliefs.” Justice Amy Coney Barrett went further, dismantling the notion that these books are simply educational. She rightly asked, “It’s presentation of the idea as fact—that’s different, right?” Then drove it home: “It’s saying, ‘This is the right view of the world. This is how we think about things. This is how you should think about things.’”

And that’s the heart of the issue: this is not about representation—it’s about reprogramming. These aren’t educational materials. They’re ideological manifestos wrapped in colorful covers, designed to normalize sin and pressure children into affirming it as truth.

We pray this case doesn’t just protect a parent’s opt-out rights—we pray it puts a stake in the heart of this entire strategy. Public schools don’t allow books that promote alcohol or tobacco use to first-graders. Why? Because they’re adult behaviors that only adults should consider. So why does LGBT ideology get a pass? Just because something is legal for adults doesn’t mean it’s morally or developmentally appropriate for children.

Let’s be clear: these aren’t just books they’re trying to force on our kids. They’re weapons of cultural warfare crafted to desensitize children to sin, reshape their moral compass, and sever their understanding of God’s design before they can even read the Ten Commandments.

We love the sinner. We always will. But we refuse to applaud sin in the name of progress. And we cannot stand by while woke educators try to lead our children into sin under the guise of tolerance.

Jesus didn’t mince words about those who lead little ones astray:

“Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him if a great millstone were hung around his neck and he were thrown into the sea” (Mark 9:42).

This case should’ve never reached the highest court. But now that it has, we pray SCOTUS doesn’t just protect our rights—it sends a message: America’s children are not yours to corrupt.

Let them keep their rainbow banners. We’ll take the truth—and raise the next generation to stand on it.